Case 2500868/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J. Barker and others v MJF Facilities Management Limited (in voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500868/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne
- Panel members
- Ms. L. Jackson, Mr. P. Curtis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J. Barker and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Newcastle upon Tyne CVP hearing on 15, 16 and 17 April 2024 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with Ms. L. Jackson and Mr. P. Curtis sitting as lay members, the tribunal dismissed all claims of the claimants named in schedule one against both respondents. It also dismissed all other claims brought by the claimants named in schedule two, apart from the claims expressly upheld in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claims of the schedule two claimants against R1 well founded and made separate compensatory awards to five claimants. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Ms Barker only succeeded on her claim for non-payment of holiday pay against R1, with £569.84 awarded forthwith. | Upheld | — | £570 |
| Other | This entry covers the blanket dismissal of all claims by the schedule one claimants against R1 and R2, and the dismissal of all other claims by the schedule two claimants. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,023
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,453
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.