Case 2500875/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Brett v Warburtons Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500875/2024
- Decision date
- 9 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gowland Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Brett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded, with the agreement of the parties, that the respondent was amended to Warburtons Ltd. It then found that the claimant’s complaint for unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it.
The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written record. No monetary remedy was awarded because the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.