Case 2500883/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Franks v Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500883/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Franks
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningPursuant to rule 21, Employment Judge Jeram recorded that Mr J Franks' complaint under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded because Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co Limited (In Administration) had failed adequately to comply with s.188. The judgment states that the claimant's claim for a protective award succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 14 April 2022, being the date on which dismissal took effect. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were said to apply to the award. The extracted text does not set out a separate quantified monetary figure for the award, so the record is limited to the protected period and the recoupment note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under s.189 TULRCA 1992; the extracted text does not state a separate monetary sum, only a protected period of 90 days beginning on 14 April 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.