Case 2500887/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thomas William Smith v Kenton and District Social Club Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500887/2019
- Decision date
- 2 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thomas William Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. At the hearing on 2 July 2019, the claimant, Mr Thomas William Smith, attended in person and the respondent was represented by Mr K Tate, the club secretary.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn by the claimant, with his consent given in person on the day. The judgment therefore records the claim as dismissed upon withdrawal, and it contains no findings on the merits of the dismissal.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any compensation, basic award, interest, or other monetary figure. No legal tests were set out in the short judgment, and there were no lay members listed with the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with his consent given in person at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.