Case 2500892/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Avery v Waterloo House Rest Home Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500892/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Avery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Johnson on 15 October 2020. The claimant, Mrs J Avery, did not attend or take part. The respondent was represented by Ms S Clarke of Counsel. The tribunal considered whether it had jurisdiction to hear the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages, because both appeared to have been presented out of time.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had been notified of the hearing by notice sent on 21 September 2020, but had not joined the CVP hearing by 10.20am. Tribunal staff attempted to contact her by telephone on the number given on the claim form, without success. The respondent's representative said solicitors acting for the respondent had emailed the claimant earlier in the week, but there was no reply. In the claimant's absence, Ms Clarke submitted that there was no evidence to support a contention that the claim form had been sent in time.
The tribunal referred to the ET1 submission routes listed on the tribunal's website and found that the claimant had not submitted the claim form by any of the permitted methods. It recorded that, following ACAS early conciliation, the claim should have been presented by 20 February 2020, but was not presented until 5 May 2020. Because there was no meaningful evidence from the claimant to show that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims in time, the tribunal was not satisfied that the time limit should be extended. Both claims were dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented outside the time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented outside the time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time and that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- time limit prescribed for doing so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.