Case 2500896/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mattieson v N & T Civils Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500896/2024
- Decision date
- 14 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mattieson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing on 11 September 2024, despite having been given notice of the hearing by a tribunal letter dated 20 May 2024. The tribunal clerk attempted to contact the claimant by telephone during the hearing but was unsuccessful.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had also failed to comply with orders issued in the 20 May 2024 letter, including orders to send the respondent a schedule of compensation, relevant documents, and a witness statement. Employment Judge Morris, sitting alone, dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or comply with tribunal orders; the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or comply with tribunal orders; the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.