Case 2500897/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jordan 1st v Patrick Parsons Limited (In Administration) 2nd Respondent: Alvarez & Marsal Europe LLP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500897/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jordan 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the 1st respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the 1st respondent to pay the claimant the gross/net sum of £92.00.
The claim against the 2nd respondent, Alvarez & Marsal Europe LLP, was dismissed. No further reasons, legal analysis, or separate remedy breakdown were recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 1st respondent; ordered to pay the claimant the gross/net sum of £92.00. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against the 2nd respondent dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £92
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.