Case 2500902/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Telford v EE Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500902/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Telford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented before the expiry of the applicable three-month time limit, calculated from the effective date of termination of 13 January 2021 and extended by ACAS Early Conciliation to 7 June 2021.
The Tribunal also found that it had been reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present the unfair dismissal claim in time. It therefore held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear that claim.
The claim for "other payments" was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No monetary award was made in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction because the claim was presented out of time and it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for "other payments" and says it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. Classified as unlawful_deduction_wages in light of the listing category, but the judgment wording is not more specific. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.