Case 2500905/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Green v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500905/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Dorothy
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Dorothy Winter, Kenneth Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant brought a claim of unfair constructive dismissal against County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. The judgment states that this claim was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded disability discrimination claims under sections 15 and 20-21 of the Equality Act 2010. Those claims were also found not well-founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as unfair constructive dismissal and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies disability discrimination claims under sections 15 and 20-21 Equality Act 2010 and states they were not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20-21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.