Case 2500917/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Nicola Ayers v Mr Paul Wriglesworth — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500917/2019
- Decision date
- 25 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris Representation
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Nicola Ayers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the preliminary hearing was treated as a final hearing under Rule 48. The respondent neither attended nor presented a response, and the claimant appeared in person. The tribunal therefore determined the matter on the basis of the papers before it.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Act. It found that the respondent did not pay the claimant at all for work she undertook on four days: Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 February 2019, and Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 March 2019.
The award was calculated by reference to seven hours' work per day at the minimum wage rate of £7.38 per hour, producing £51.66 per day and £206.64 in total. The judgment states that the total was calculated by reference to gross pay and that any income tax or employee national insurance liability would be the claimant's responsibility.
The judgment also records that any complaint inferred from the ET1 that the claimant had been subjected to disability discrimination was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded on that complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant at all for work done on Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 February 2019, and Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 March 2019. It calculated the deduction at seven hours per day at £7.38 per hour, making £51.66 per day and £206.64 in total. | Upheld | — | £207 |
| Disability discrimination | Any complaint inferred from the ET1 that the claimant had been subjected to disability discrimination was said to have been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed. No merits finding was made on that complaint. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £207
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.