Case 2500924/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Foodcourt & Cocktails Ltd and others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500924/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr X Davies brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against Foodcourt & Cocktails Ltd, The Village Bar and Grill Ltd, and 4TheWkend Ltd. None of the respondents presented a response or attended the hearing on 30 October 2023 before Employment Judge Johnson.
The tribunal found that 4TheWkend Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period between 27 January 2023 and 15 February 2023. The amount deducted was £240, and the judgment records that this sum was the gross amount deducted.
The complaint was therefore well-founded against the third respondent only. The judgment ordered 4TheWkend Ltd to pay the claimant £240, with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the third respondent, 4TheWkend Ltd, made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 27 January 2023 to 15 February 2023 in the sum of £240. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £240
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.