Case 2500931/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Benjamin Parker-Marshall v BM Logistics Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500931/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Benjamin Parker-Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr Benjamin Parker-Marshall against BM Logistics Management Limited. It upheld his claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered the respondent to pay £500 gross.
It also upheld the claimant’s Working Time Regulations 1998 claim for failure to pay holiday pay and ordered payment of £820 gross. The judgment records a total award of £1,320 gross. No separate findings on liability beyond those two statutory claims are set out in the extracted text, and no additional remedy components are identified.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim for unauthorised deduction of wages well founded and awarded £500 gross. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found the Working Time Regulations 1998 claim for failure to pay holiday pay well founded and awarded £820 gross. | Upheld | — | £820 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,320
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.