Case 2500932/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Pine v RLAJ Fleet Maintenance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500932/2021
- Decision date
- 13 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Pine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Moss, sitting at Newcastle by CVP on 13 October 2021, upheld the claimant Mr R Pine's claim that RLAJ Fleet Maintenance Limited had made an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,858.92, described as the amount unlawfully deducted.
The written record does not set out additional findings of fact or any separate breakdown of remedy beyond the single sum ordered. It also records that the hearing was remote, by video, and that the parties did not object to the case being heard remotely.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,859 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,859
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,859
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.