Case 2500945/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Trevor Stamp v SE-Tek Ltd (in administration) — 2023

Case reference: 2500945/2022
Decision date: 12 July 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Jeram

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Trevor Stamp

Respondent

SE-Tek Ltd (in administration)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Jeram found that the claimant’s complaint under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded because the respondent failed adequately to comply with a requirement of s.188. The tribunal therefore upheld the claim for a protective award against SE-Tek Ltd (in administration).

The judgment ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 13 July 2022, which the judgment identifies as the date on which dismissal took effect. The extracted text does not state a specific monetary figure for the award.

The judgment also records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply to the award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint under s.189 TULRCA 1992 succeeded, that the claim for a protective award succeeded, and that the respondent failed adequately to comply with s.188 TULRCA 1992. No monetary sum for the award is stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.