Case 2500947/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Fawell v Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500947/2021
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Members
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
- Panel members
- Mr Dorman-Smith, Mr Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Fawell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that the claim was presented outside the primary limitation period under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, finding that it was not well founded. The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was likewise found not well founded and dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment records the outcomes without any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because it was presented outside the primary limitation period under section 123 Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.