Case 2500958/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr B Campbell v Sean McAndrews trading as Osbourne Motor Transport and 1 other — 2022

Case reference: 2500958/2022
Decision date: 10 October 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
Venue: Newcastle CFCTC

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr B Campbell

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

All claims against the second respondent were dismissed. Against the first respondent, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages claim well-founded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £564.38 gross. It also found the accrued holiday pay claim well-founded under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded £338.61 gross, both subject to any deductions of tax and national insurance where applicable.

The tribunal further awarded the claimant two weeks' gross pay of £1,128.76 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to provide a section 1 statement. It dismissed the claimant's notice pay claim, the separate breach of contract claim, and the claim for compensation for stress and anxiety as not well-founded. The total award recorded was £2,031.75.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £564.38 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance where applicable.	Upheld	—	£564
Holiday pay	The tribunal found the accrued holiday pay claim well-founded under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £338.61 gross, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance where applicable.	Upheld	—	£339
Other	The tribunal awarded two weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement under section 1.	Upheld	—	£1,129
Breach of contract	The judgment describes this as the claimant's notice pay claim, which was found not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	A separate breach of contract claim was found not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Other

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,032; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.