Case 2500960/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Parker v Gaming Venues Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500960/2024
- Decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Parker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 June 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr K Parker an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. Mr Parker did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Sweeney struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim, any liability findings, or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 18 June 2025 to make representations or request a hearing, but he did not make written representations or sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.