Case 2500967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
GMB v Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500967/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
GMB
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under rule 21. It found that the claimant's complaint under s.189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, alleging inadequate compliance with s.188, succeeded, and it therefore made a protective award.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days, beginning on 14 April 2022, being the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect, to each employee in respect of whom the claimant union was recognised by the respondent for collective bargaining. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were stated to apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The claim was determined under rule 21. The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint under s.189 TULRCA 1992 that the respondent failed adequately to comply with s.188 TULRCA 1992 succeeded, and made a protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.