Case 2500979/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Foster v Jaspers Catering North East Limited (Trading As Jaspers Catering Services) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500979/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Foster
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 February 2021, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 21 October 2020 and had failed to dial in to the telephone hearing on 29 January 2021.
The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The response was therefore struck out. The Tribunal added that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but could participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's response was struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. No substantive merits determination is recorded in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.