Case 2500989/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Stanwix v Jane Seagrove — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500989/2022
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Stanwix
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 12 October 2022 at Newcastle, heard remotely by video, Employment Judge Shore recorded that the claimant, Miss M Stanwix, appeared in person and the respondent, Jane Seagrove, did not appear. The tribunal dealt with a single claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that the claim was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £325.00 gross. The written decision records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deduction of wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well-founded and ordered payment of £325.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £325
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.