Case 2500993/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Case Numbers: 2500993/2025 & others EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Miss C Lowe & others v Talent84 Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026

Case reference: 2500993/2025
Decision date: 31 July 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Loy

Indexed: 18 September 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Case Numbers: 2500993/2025 & others EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Miss C Lowe & others

Respondent

Talent84 Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal upheld the claims of Miss C Lowe and all other scheduled claimants that Talent84 Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also granted the claimants’ application to amend the respondent’s identity from Talnt84 Ltd to Talent84 Ltd.

The tribunal made a protective award under section 189(3) for the lead claimant and all other scheduled claimants. Each claimant’s protected period under section 189(4) was 90 days beginning on 11 April 2025. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply to the awards. The judgment states no monetary amount.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award claims for failure to comply with section 188 were all well-founded. The award covers Miss C Lowe and all other scheduled claimants, with a protected period of 90 days beginning on 11 April 2025 for each claimant. No monetary amount is specified.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.