Case 2500996/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Duffie v 2020 Group Construction Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500996/2020
- Decision date
- 31 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Duffie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Duffie brought a breach of contract claim against 2020 Group Construction Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) for failure to give notice. The judgment records that his employment ended on 13 March 2020 without any notice and in breach of contract.
The respondent did not present a response. The tribunal referred to Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and said it was satisfied, on the information in the claim form, that there was sufficient material to determine the claim without a hearing.
The tribunal therefore upheld the breach of contract claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £700. The judgment does not break that figure down into separate heads of loss or make any additional remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a claim for failure to give notice, and orders payment of the net sum of £700. | Upheld | — | £700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £700
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.