Case 2500996/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Harmer v Alcyone Healthcare North East Ltd Heard: Remotely (by video) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500996/2021
- Decision date
- 2 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Harmer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by video on 7 September 2021 before Employment Judge S Shore. The respondent did not appear. The judgment records that the respondent’s name was amended to Alcyone Healthcare North East Ltd and that service of the claim was dispensed with, with the respondent deemed to have been served.
Mr S Harmer’s claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, described in the judgment as failure to pay wages, succeeded. The tribunal found the claim well-founded in relation to the period 1 April 2021 to 25 April 2021 and ordered the respondent to pay £3,333.34, subject to deductions for income tax and National Insurance.
His claim for breach of contract, described as failure to pay notice pay, also succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,666.67, again subject to deductions for income tax and National Insurance. No other remedy components, legal tests, or additional findings are recorded in the written judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeding claim for unauthorised deduction of wages, described as failure to pay wages, for the period 1 April 2021 to 25 April 2021. Tribunal ordered payment less deductions for income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Breach of contract | Succeeding claim for breach of contract, described as failure to pay notice pay. Tribunal ordered payment less deductions for income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.