Case 2500997/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Burnett v Pass N Go Driving School Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500997/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Ms C E Hunter, Mr G Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Burnett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that Mrs K Burnett's complaint of unlawful discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also held that her complaint of unfair dismissal within the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. The judgment did not set out written reasons, and remedy was reserved for a hearing on 7 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of unlawful discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal within the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. Remedy was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 15 of the Equality Act 2010
- Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.