Case 2500999/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Baddams v Northumberland County Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500999/2018
- Decision date
- 19 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Members
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs C Hunter, Mr J Weatherston
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Baddams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims by Mr P Baddams against Northumberland County Council at North Shields Hearing Centre on 3, 4, 5 and 6 June 2019 before Employment Judge Martin, sitting with members Mrs C Hunter and Mr J Weatherston.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and discrimination on the grounds of religion and/or belief were each not well-founded and were dismissed. No remedy or monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the complaint of wrongful dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of religion and/or belief was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.