Case 2501001/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Vickers v Sutcom Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501001/2024
- Decision date
- 4 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Vickers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 4 June 2024 before Employment Judge Sweeney. The Claimant, Mr D Vickers, appeared in person and the Respondent, Sutcom Limited, was represented by Tom Shears, solicitor.
The written record states that the judgment of the Tribunal was that the Claimant's application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. The record does not set out any substantive findings beyond that outcome.
The note to the judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment concerns the Claimant's application for interim relief only. The Tribunal dismissed the application. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.