Case 2501009/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Bloomfield v Collect Your Rent Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501009/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Bloomfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Newcastle on 15 July 2019, Employment Judge Martin sat alone. Miss I Bloomfield appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or send representation. The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of 4 weeks' wages of £1,919.44 gross, a further week's wages of £412.50 gross, and 7 hours' overtime of £77.00 gross, recording that this amounted to £3,408.94 in wages unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also found the claimant's complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations, described as failure to pay accrued holiday pay, well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £412.50 gross for accrued holiday pay. The extracted judgment contains no further findings on liability or any additional remedy beyond those monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment orders £1,919.44 for 4 weeks' wages, £412.50 for one additional week's wages, and £77.00 for 7 hours' overtime, stating that this amounts to £3,408.94; the listed components do not arithmetically total that figure. | Upheld | — | £3,409 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found a breach of the Working Time Regulations for failure to pay accrued holiday pay and ordered £412.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,821
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.