Case 2501009/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dermody v JS & DP Limited t/a Body and Soul Fitness Studio — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501009/2022
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dermody
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal ordered JS & DP Limited t/a Body and Soul Fitness Studio to pay Mr J Dermody £190 gross for unpaid wages and £115.90 gross for accrued unused holiday pay on termination of employment. Those two sums were recorded as separate awards in the written judgment.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £556 net because it failed to provide the claimant with a statement of initial employment particulars required by section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record does not set out further reasons for these awards.
The total sum ordered was £861.90. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum awarded in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £190 |
| Holiday pay | Gross sum awarded in respect of accrued unused holiday pay upon termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £116 |
| Other | Net sum awarded for failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars required by section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £556 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £862
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.