Case 2501016/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Preece v The Chief Constable Northumbria Police — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501016/2020
- Decision date
- 9 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Preece
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 29 June 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr A Preece an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, on why his claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive determination of liability is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy was awarded. The only stated reason for the outcome is the claimant's failure to pursue the claim and respond adequately to the Tribunal's earlier notice.
The decision was issued by Employment Judge Aspden on 9 August 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying legal claim; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 29/6/2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.