Case 2501019/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Smith v Sir John Fitzgerald Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501019/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the Tribunal substituted Sir John Fitzgerald Limited as respondent in place of Crafted Limited. The only substantive monetary order recorded in the judgment was that Sir John Fitzgerald Limited must pay Miss A Smith £592.31 by 9 November 2022, described as the amount remaining due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The judgment also records that all other claims made by the claimant in the proceedings were dismissed because they had been withdrawn by the claimant. No further reasoning, legal test, or breakdown of those withdrawn claims is set out in the short written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The Tribunal ordered payment of £592.31, described as the amount remaining due to the claimant under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £592 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims made in the proceedings were dismissed because they had been withdrawn by the claimant, but it does not identify those claims individually. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £592
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.