Case 2501020/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 2501020/2025
- Decision date
- 8 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ellis's complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations concerning holiday pay and his breach of contract complaint concerning notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal found Mr Ellis's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded. Bulldog Bars 2025 Ltd was ordered to pay him £36.76 net. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; the written judgment records no further reasoning or remedy breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint was described as breach of the Working Time Regulations (holiday pay) and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint concerned notice pay and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered payment of £36.76 net. | Upheld | — | £37 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.