Case 2501042/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Wood v Mr Gorjeet Singh Trading as Cruby’s Flowers — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501042/2019
- Decision date
- 19 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Wood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Wood brought a claim against Mr Gorjeet Singh trading as Cruby’s Flowers. The tribunal, sitting at North Shields on 19 July 2019 before Employment Judge Shepherd, determined the case on the papers under the Rule 21 universal template. It found that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £469.80 gross. The judgment records that this is a gross figure and that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance due on it. No other heads of claim, legal tests, or additional remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £469.80 gross. The judgment states the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance on that sum. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £470
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.