Case 2501044/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Smith v ISS UK Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501044/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint that she had been underpaid wages and that wages received had been paid late. The respondent conceded that wages had been paid late, but maintained that the claimant had received all monies due to her.
Neither party attended the listed liability and remedy hearing. The tribunal considered the claim form, response, correspondence, payslips, and a witness statement from Nicola Philp on behalf of the respondent setting out the calculation of sums due.
The tribunal was satisfied that the respondent had paid the claimant all monies due to her. The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was therefore dismissed as not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant alleged underpaid wages and late payment of wages. The respondent conceded wages had been paid late but said all monies due had been paid. The tribunal dismissed the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.