Case 2501057/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Allan and others v Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501057/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Allan and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 15 December 2022 Employment Judge Jeram gave judgment under rule 21 in favour of Mr W Allan and the other claimants against Pipeline Engineering & Supply Co Limited (In Administration). The tribunal held that the respondent had failed adequately to comply with the requirement in s.188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The judgment recorded that each claimant listed in the schedule succeeded in his or her own claim for a protective award under s.189 of the 1992 Act. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 14 April 2022, that being the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect.
The judgment also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply to the awards. The extracted text does not set out a monetary figure for each claimant or a single aggregate sum, so no split award amount can be recorded from this judgment text alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal held that the respondent failed adequately to comply with s.188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that each listed claimant succeeded in an individual claim for a protective award under s.189 of the same Act. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 21
- s.188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.