Case 2501061/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Heenan v Maryam Cleary t/a Mc Lettings & Property Management — 2026
- Case reference
- 2501061/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Representation
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Heenan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt North Shields on 9 December 2019, Employment Judge Nicol heard Mr T Heenan's claims against Maryam Cleary t/a Mc Lettings & Property Management. The tribunal found well founded his complaints that he did not receive notice or pay in lieu of notice, that there were unauthorised deductions from wages, that he did not receive all of the holiday pay to which he was entitled on termination, and that he had not been reimbursed for expenses incurred on the respondent's behalf.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £240 in respect of notice or pay in lieu of notice, £360 for unauthorised deductions from wages, £180 for holiday pay, and £10 for expenses. The judgment also directed that Mr Heenan account to HMRC for any income tax and National Insurance contributions due on those sums.
The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed in its entirety. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint that the claimant did not receive notice or a payment in lieu of notice; the tribunal awarded £240. | Upheld | — | £240 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint that the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages; the tribunal awarded £360. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint that the claimant did not receive all holiday pay due on termination of employment; the tribunal awarded £180. | Upheld | — | £180 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint in respect of expenses incurred on behalf of the respondent; the tribunal awarded £10. | Upheld | — | £10 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed in its entirety; the written record does not set out the underlying causes of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £790
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.