Case 2501069/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Lunn v PFM (GBR) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501069/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Lunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 7 January 2020 at North Shields Hearing Centre, Mrs S Lunn attended in person and the respondent did not attend. Employment Judge Arullendran recorded that the claimant’s claims for redundancy pay, holiday pay, notice pay and unfair dismissal were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with her consent given in person at the hearing. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or statutory tests, because the claims were withdrawn before determination.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with her consent given in person at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with her consent given in person at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a notice pay claim; the legal basis is not separately identified in the text, so this is classified as breach of contract. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with her consent given in person at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.