Case 2501069/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Appleby v AMB Packaging UK Ltd Heard: Remotely by video — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501069/2021
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Appleby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr K Appleby's claim of unauthorised deduction of wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. No separate findings are recorded in the written judgment about other claims or issues, and the decision is limited to that wages claim.
The tribunal ordered AMB Packaging UK Ltd to pay Mr Appleby £5,278.00, subject to deduction of income tax and National Insurance. The hearing was held remotely by video on 8 October 2021 before Employment Judge S Shore. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's unauthorised deduction of wages claim under section 13 ERA 1996 was well-founded. | Upheld | — | £5,278 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,278
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.