Case 2501070/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D McKenna v Ebac Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501070/2019
- Decision date
- 19 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D McKenna
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs D McKenna brought a complaint for damages for breach of contract against Ebac Group Limited. At the hearing on 19 September 2019 before Employment Judge Aspden in Middlesbrough, the tribunal held that the complaint was not well founded and dismissed it.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested. The judgment therefore records the outcome but does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning in the written decision.
The respondent's application for costs was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint for damages for breach of contract was not well founded and dismissed it. No separate monetary award was identified for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.