Case 2501070/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Atkinson and others named on the attached schedule v Tolent Construction Limited “In Administration” — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501070/2023
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Atkinson and others named on the attached schedule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants brought claims on 23 May 2023 for a protective award. The respondent entered administration on 13 February 2023, did not enter a response, and its administrator agreed to the lifting of the moratorium so that the protective award claims only could proceed. The Secretary of State for Business and Trade was joined as an interested party.
The Tribunal found that in February 2023 the respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at each of three sites: Cleveland House in Thornaby, Derwent House in Gateshead, and Colton House in Leeds. The first dismissal took effect on 13 February 2023. It found there was no proper warning or consultation with a recognised trade union or the claimants, and that no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation under section 188A of the 1992 Act.
The Tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of the duty under section 188 of the 1992 Act and that the claimants' section 189 claims were well-founded. It made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 13 February 2023, equivalent to remuneration for that period for the claimants named in the schedule. No specific monetary award was stated in the judgment.
The judgment was entered without a hearing because the respondent had indicated it did not wish to defend the claims. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply, and the respondent was directed to provide the Secretary of State with the required claimant and termination-date information before payment under the protective award becomes due following the recoupment process.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements. The award was expressed as 90 days' remuneration from 13 February 2023, not as a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 95 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.