Case 2501071/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Mills v Marine Scaffolding Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501071/2019
- Decision date
- 26 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at North Shields on 26 July 2019 before Employment Judge Shepherd, considered Mr B Mills's claims against Marine Scaffolding Ltd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Mullen.
The claim for breach of contract in respect of notice pay was dismissed because it was found not well founded. The separate claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £320.00 gross in respect of the unlawful deduction claim. The judgment records that the claimant is responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was brought in respect of notice pay and was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found this claim well-founded and ordered payment of £320.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £320
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.