Case 2501073/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Wilson v City Fresh Food Services Limited Heard: Remotely by video — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501073/2020
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr C Wilson's breach of contract claim, pleaded as a failure to pay notice pay, was well-founded. It ordered City Fresh Food Services Limited to pay £711.54, described as two weeks' pay in lieu of notice, subject to deduction of tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,067.31, calculated as two weeks' pay multiplied by a factor of 1.5, payable gross. The judgment records that the correct name of the respondent is City Fresh Food Services Limited.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay notice pay succeeded; the tribunal ordered two weeks' pay in lieu of notice, subject to deduction of tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £712 |
| Redundancy | The statutory redundancy payment claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered two weeks' pay multiplied by 1.5, payable gross. | Upheld | — | £1,067 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,779
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.