Case 2501144/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ridgeway v Apex Radio — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501144/2021
- Decision date
- 9 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ridgeway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Ridgeway, brought complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination against Apex Radio. The hearing took place by Cloud Video Platform on 6 April 2021 before Employment Judge Martin, with representation for both parties recorded in the judgment.
During the hearing, the parties agreed terms of settlement. The judgment therefore records that the claimant’s unfair dismissal and disability discrimination complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal, unless either party applied to relist the case for hearing within 28 days of the hearing date. The written reasons state only that the parties agreed terms of settlement.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal, subject to either party applying to relist within 28 days of the hearing date. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal, subject to either party applying to relist within 28 days of the hearing date. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.