Case 2501166/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Carol Bell v P.F. Burridge & Sons Limited (in administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501166/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Carol Bell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCarol Bell was employed as an Administrative Assistant at the Respondent’s Newcastle premises. On 17 March 2020 she and the other employees on site were told that their employment was terminated with immediate effect by reason of redundancy because the business was closing. The tribunal recorded that there had been no prior warning and no appropriate representatives at the workplace.
The Claimant presented her claim on 17 June 2020. Because the Respondent was in administration, the Claimant sought and obtained the Administrator’s consent to continue with the protective award claim on 5 October 2020. No response was presented, so the matter was determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the available material.
The tribunal found that the Respondent took no steps to inform or consult the Claimant or others in accordance with its duty under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It held that there had been a total failure to comply with that duty and that a protective award was justified.
The judgment declares the section 189 claim well founded and makes a protective award in respect of the Claimant. The protected period was held to begin on 17 March 2020 and to last for 90 days, with remuneration ordered for that protected period. The extracted text does not state a monetary total for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award under section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment awards remuneration for the protected period but does not state a cash figure in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.