Case 2501176/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robert Fulcher & Others v Opsec Security Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501176/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representatives
- Venue
- via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robert Fulcher & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the grouped claims of Mr Robert Fulcher and others against Opsec Security Ltd by CVP on 4 and 5 January 2021. The only recorded claim type in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written judgment records that those claims were not well founded and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded. The published decision also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the extracted text contains no fuller reasoning beyond the outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claimants' claims of unauthorised deduction from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 were not well founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.