Case 2501214/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H J Wilson v Intruder Detection & Surveillance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501214/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H J Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H J Wilson brought claims against Intruder Detection & Surveillance Limited for breach of contract and unlawful deductions from wages. The judgment records that the respondent name was amended from IDS Fire & Security to Intruder Detection & Surveillance Limited.
The claims for breach of contract relating to holiday pay and payment of a car allowance were dismissed because they had been issued outside the statutory time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for those claims to have been issued in time.
The claim for breach of contract relating to payment for loss of a telephone was dismissed upon withdrawal. The claim for unlawful deductions from wages was found not well founded and was dismissed.
The decision was given after a remote video hearing on 16 March 2021. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim relating to holiday pay. The tribunal found it was issued outside the statutory time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been issued in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim relating to payment of a car allowance. The tribunal found it was issued outside the statutory time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been issued in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim relating to payment for loss of a telephone was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deductions from wages was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.