Case 2501225/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Johnson v Romag Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501225/2020
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms N Johnson's claim against Romag Limited under rule 37. By a letter dated 6 October 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 20 November 2020 was vacated and did not take place.
No merits findings or remedy award are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying claim type(s); it records only that "the claim" was struck out under rule 37 for failure to pursue it and failure to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.