Case 2501236/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Georgia Hauxwell v Akat Leisure Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501236/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Georgia Hauxwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought a claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The Respondent (originally named as Andrew Taylor, amended by order of Employment Judge Jeram to Akat Leisure Ltd) did not present a response within the time permitted, and no application for reconsideration was outstanding. The Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, being satisfied that a determination could properly be made on the available material.
On the evidence, the Claimant was employed from 24 March 2023 to 22 March 2024. From the start of the holiday year on 6 April 2023 to the termination date she had accrued 125.5 hours of annual leave and taken 87.5 hours, leaving 37.5 hours of untaken accrued leave. Her contractual hourly rate was £12, producing outstanding holiday pay of £453.
The Tribunal found that this sum was properly payable to her on termination pursuant to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 but had not in fact been paid. The claim was therefore well founded and the Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £453.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim framed as unlawful deduction of wages / failure to pay holiday pay under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; 37.5 hours of accrued untaken leave at £12/hour. | Upheld | — | £453 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £453
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 16 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.