Case 2501243/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Denise Mennim v New College Durham — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501243/2020
- Decision date
- 14 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Mr S Carter, Mrs S Don
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Denise Mennim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard Ms Denise Mennim's claims against New College Durham by video over 7 to 14 January 2022 before Employment Judge Aspden, sitting with Mr S Carter and Mrs S Don. The written judgment records that the judgment was unanimous.
The Tribunal held that none of the claimant's claims were well founded. It therefore dismissed all of the claims brought in the case, including the unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and disability discrimination claims identified in the case listing.
No separate liability findings or remedy assessment are set out in the written record. The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's standard practice.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.