Case 2501260/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C H O’Neill v Paul Atkinson Group Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501260/2022
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C H O’Neill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C H O’Neill brought a claim against Paul Atkinson Group Limited (in voluntary liquidation) for unauthorised deduction from wages. The case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal via CVP on 19 January 2023 before Employment Judge Jeram, with the respondent not attending.
The written judgment states that the claimant’s claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £960.00, subject to deductions in respect of income tax and National Insurance.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No additional findings, legal tests, or split of the award are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of £960.00, subject to deductions in respect of income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £960 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.