Case 2501261/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Fowler v SSL Healthcare Ltd t/a Brookfields Care Home — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501261/2022
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Robertson Representation
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Fowler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Fowler's claim for unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was heard at Teesside Justice Centre on 2, 3 and 25 May 2023 before Employment Judge L Robertson. The respondent was SSL Healthcare Ltd t/a Brookfields Care Home, represented by Mr P Joy, and the claimant was represented by Mr A Jones.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded. The written judgment does not set out the oral reasons or any separate findings on remedy, and no monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim pursuant to Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is well-founded and succeeds. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.